Regional analgesia and surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis

Abstract Background The effect of regional analgesia on perioperative infectious complications remains unknown. We therefore tested the hypothesis that a composite of serious infections after colorectal surgery is less common in patients with regional analgesia than in those given Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV-PCA) with opiates. Methods Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery lasting one hour or more under general anesthesia at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus between 2009 and 2015 were included in this retrospective analysis. Exposures were defined as regional postoperative analgesia with epidurals or Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks (TAP); or IV-PCA with opiates only. The outcome was defined as a composite of in-hospital serious infections, including intraabdominal abscess, pelvic abscess, deep or organ-space Surgical Site Infection (SSI), clostridium difficile, pneumonia, or sepsis. Logistic regression model adjusted for the imbalanced potential confounding factors among the subset of matched surgeries was used to report the odds ratios along with 95% confidence limits. The significance criterion was p < 0.05. Results A total of 7811 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria of which we successfully matched 681 regional anesthesia patients to 2862 IV-PCA only patients based on propensity scores derived from potential confounding factors. There were 82 (12%) in-hospital postoperative serious infections in the regional analgesia group vs. 285 (10%) in IV-PCA patients. Regional analgesia was not significantly associated with serious infection (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% Confidence Interval 0.87‒1.49; p-value = 0.339) after adjusting for surgical duration and volume of intraoperative crystalloids. Conclusion Regional analgesia should not be selected as postoperative analgesic technique to reduce infections.

Neuraxial labor analgesia: a literature review / Analgesia de parto no neuroeixo: uma revisão da literatura

Abstract The use of analgesia techniques for labor has become increasingly frequent, with neuraxial techniques being the most commonly used and most effective. Labor pain entails a number of physiological consequences that may be negative for the mother and fetus, and therefore must be treated. This literature review was performed through a search in the PubMed database, from July to November 2016, and included articles in English or Portuguese, published between 2011 and 2016 or anteriorly, if relevant to the topic. The techniques were divided into the following topics: induction (epidural, combined epidural-spinal, continuous spinal, and epidural with dural puncture) and maintenance of analgesia (continuous epidural infusion, patient-controlled epidural analgesia, and intermittent epidural bolus). Epidural analgesia does not alter the incidence of cesarean sections or fetal prognosis, and maternal request is a sufficient indication for its initiation. The combined technique has the advantage of a faster onset of analgesia; however, patients are subject to a higher incidence of pruritus resulting from the intrathecal administration of opioids. Patient-controlled analgesia seems to be an excellent technique, reducing the consumption of local anesthetics, the number of anesthesiologist interventions, and increasing maternal satisfaction.

Resumo O uso de técnicas de analgesia para o trabalho de parto tem se tornado cada vez mais frequente. As técnicas neuroaxiais são as mais comumente usadas e de maior eficácia. A dor do trabalho de parto traz uma série de consequências fisiológicas que podem ser negativas para a mãe e para o feto, e por isso deve ser tratada. Esta revisão de literatura foi feita na base de dados PubMed, de julho a novembro de 2016, e foram incluídos artigos em inglês ou portuguê publicados entre 2011 e 2016, ou mais antigos que fossem relevantes ao tema. As técnicas foram divididas nos tópicos: indução (peridural, raquiperidural combinada, raquianestesia contínua e peridural com punção dural) e manutenção da analgesia (infusão peridural contínua, analgesia peridural controlada pela paciente e bolus peridural intermitente). A analgesia peridural não altera a incidência de cesarianas nem o prognóstico fetal, e o desejo materno é indicação suficiente para seu início. A técnica combinada apresenta como vantagem um início mais rápido da analgesia, entretanto as pacientes estão sujeitas a maior incidência de prurido decorrente da administração intratecal de opioides. A analgesia controlada pela paciente parece ser uma excelente técnica, diminui o consumo de anestésicos locais e o número de intervenções do anestesiologista e aumenta a satisfação materna.

Continuous quadratus lumborum type 3 block provides effective postoperative analgesia for hip surgery: case report / O bloqueio contínuo do quadrado lombar tipo 3 fornece analgesia pós-operatória efetiva para cirurgia do quadril: relato de caso

Abstract Introduction: Hip surgery is a major surgery that causes severe postoperative pain. Although pain during rest is usually considerably reduced mobilization is important in terms of thromboembolic complications. The quadratus lumborum block is a regional analgesic technique that blocks T6-L3 nerve branches. This block may provide adequate analgesia and reduce opioid consumption after hip surgery. Case report: We performed continuous quadratus lumborum type 3 block in two patients who underwent hip arthroplasty. Postoperative 24-h pain scores, local anesthetic consumptions on patient-controlled analgesia and additional analgesic requirement were recorded. In two patients, postoperative pain scores were less than 6 during rest and physiotherapy. Patient was mobilized in the early postoperative period without additional opioid analgesic requirement and without muscle weakness. Discussion: Continuous quadratus lumborum block may be used to relieve postoperative acute pain in hip surgery because it provides one-sided anesthesia without muscle weakness.

Resumo Introdução: A cirurgia de quadril é uma cirurgia de grande porte que causa dor intensa no pós-operatório. Embora a dor durante o repouso seja consideravelmente reduzida, a mobilização é importante em termos de complicações tromboembólicas. O bloqueio doquadrado lombar é uma técnica analgésica regional que bloqueia os ramos nervosos de T6-L3. Esse bloqueio pode fornecer analgesia adequada e reduzir o consumo de opioides após cirurgiasde quadril. Relato de caso: Realizamos o bloqueio contínuo do quadrado lombar tipo 3 em dois pacientes submetidos à artroplastia de quadril. Durante as 24 hs de pós-operatório foram registrados os escores de dor, o consumo de anestésicos locais em analgesia controlada pelo paciente e a necessidade de analgésicos adicionais. Em dois pacientes, os escores de dor pós-operatória foram < 6 durante o repouso e fisioterapia. O paciente foi mobilizado no período pós-operatório imediato, sem precisar de analgésico opioide adicional e sem fraqueza muscular. Discussão: O bloqueio contínuo do quadrado lombar pode ser usado para aliviar a dor aguda no pós-operatório de cirurgia de quadril porque fornece anestesia unilateral sem fraqueza muscular.

Addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in ultrasonography-guided paravertebral blockade potentiates postoperative pain relief among patients undergoing thoracotomy / Adição de dexmedetomidina à bupivacaína em bloqueio paravertebral guiado por ultrassom potencializa o alívio da dor pós-operatória em pacientes submetidos à toracotomia

Abstract Background and objective: Thoracic paravertebral blockade is an alternative regional technique for comforting post-thoracotomy pain, thereby decreasing opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness, respiratory depression and health care costs. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of bupivacaine and bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain score and analgesic consumption in thoracotomy patients who had undergone ultrasonography-guided paravertebral blockade. Material and method: 93 ASA I-II patients aged 18-65 years were included in the study and scheduled for thoracic surgery. Prior to anesthesia induction, the paravertebral blockade procedure was performed by an anesthetist with ultrasonography. Cases were randomly stratified into three groups. The paravertebral blockade procedure was performed with 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine injection in Group B (n = 31) and 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine + 1 mL dexmedetomidine (100 µg) injection in Group BD. Group C received postoperative i.v. morphine via patient-controlled analgesia without paravertebral blockade. Post-operative pain scores were recorded in the recovery room and post-operatively using a VAS. Hemodynamic parameters, adverse effects and morphine consumption were also recorded. Results: No significant difference was determined between Group B and Group C regarding intra-operative adverse effects such as bradicardia and hypotension, while these adverse effects were significantly higher in Group BD (p = 0.04). VAS scores with rest and upon movement were significantly lower in Group BD compared to Group C (p < 0.001). Total morphine consumption was significantly lower in both Group B and Group BD in comparison with Group C (p < 0.001). In Group BD, HR and MAP were lower, but this was not clinically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine lowers postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption in thoracotomy patients who receive ultrasonography guided paravertebral blockade.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivo: O bloqueio paravertebral torácico é uma técnica regional opcional para o alívio da dor pós-toracotomia, deste modo diminui o consumo de opioides, náuseas e vômitos no pós-operatório, tontura, depressão respiratória e custos com saúde. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar os efeitos de bupivacaína isolada e bupivacaína + dexmedetomidina no escore de dor pós-operatória e no consumo de analgésicos em pacientes submetidos à toracotomia sob bloqueio paravertebral guiado por ultrassom. Material e método: Noventa e três pacientes, ASA I-II, com idades entre 18 e 65 anos, foram incluídos no estudo e programados para cirurgia torácica. Antes da indução anestésica, o procedimento de bloqueio paravertebral foi realizado por um anestesista com o uso de ultrassom. Os casos foram estratificados aleatoriamente em três grupos. O procedimento de bloqueio paravertebral foi realizado com injeção de 20 mL de bupivacaína a 0,5% no Grupo B (n = 31) e de 20 mL de bupivacaína a 0,5% + 1 mL de dexmedetomidina (100 µg) no Grupo BD. O Grupo C recebeu morfina intravenosa via analgesia controlada pelo paciente sem bloqueio paravertebral. Os escores de dor pós-operatória foram registrados na sala de recuperação e no pós-operatório usando a escala VAS. Parâmetros hemodinâmicos, efeitos adversos e consumo de morfina também foram registrados. Resultados: Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos B e C em relação a efeitos adversos intraoperatórios, como bradicardia e hipotensão, enquanto esses efeitos adversos foram significativamente maiores no Grupo BD (p = 0,04). Os escores VAS em repouso e movimento foram significativamente menores no Grupo BD em relação ao Grupo C (p < 0,001). O consumo total de morfina foi significativamente menor nos grupos B e BD em comparação com o Grupo C (p < 0,001). No Grupo BD, a frequência cardíaca e a pressão arterial média foram menores, mas esse resultado não foi clinicamente significativo (p < 0,05). Conclusão: A adição de dexmedetomidina à bupivacaína reduz os escores de dor pós-operatória e o consumo de morfina em pacientes submetidos à toracotomia sob bloqueio paravertebral guiado por ultrassom.

El dolor agudo posoperatorio, aún un problema en el paciente quirúrgico / Acute postoperative pain

Introducción: el dolor ha sido durante mucho tiempo subvalorado y manejado inadecuadamente de manera frecuente, tanto en niños como en adultos. Lamentablemente, en nuestro medio carecemos de esquemas que garanticen en su totalidad el alivio del dolor, pues, ni el dolor agudo, ni el crónico suelen recibir un tratamiento adecuado por muy diversas razones. Objetivo: destacar la importancia de la planificación de la analgesia posoperatoria. Método: estudio de revisión en la literatura, en el manejo del dolor agudo posoperatorio, procedentes de países de Iberoamérica. La revisión se realizó de la literatura escrita, y además, se hizo búsqueda en Internet. En los artículos revisados se obtuvieron distintos aspectos clínicos del dolor y de planificación de la analgesia posoperatoria. Desarrollo: el dolor agudo posoperatorio produce una serie de efectos a corto y largo plazo en el paciente quirúrgico, por lo cual se requiere de una evaluación inicial previa a la cirugía, un plan anestésico individualizado y un estrecho control posoperatorio. La analgesia posoperatoria es una necesidad en el control del dolor agudo posoperatorio, que precisa de la formulación de un plan terapéutico individualizado, preventivo, consensuado y relacionado lógicamente con la realidad presente del paciente. Consideraciones finales: la elección de una correcta analgesia posoperatoria, adecuada al tipo de cirugía y al entorno del paciente, es clave para el desarrollo de una buena y efectiva recuperación funcional posoperatoria(AU)

Introduction: pain has long been frequently undervalued and inadequately managed, both in children and adults. Unfortunately, in our field we lack of schemes that guarantee pain relief entirely, because neither acute pain nor chronic pain receive adequate treatment for many different reasons. Objective: to highlight the importance of planning postoperative analgesia. Method: review study in the literature from Ibero-American countries on the management of acute postoperative pain. The review was made in the written literature, and in addition a search was made on the Internet. In the reviewed articles, different clinical aspects of pain and planning of postoperative analgesia were obtained. Development: acute postoperative pain produces a series of short and long-term effects in the surgical patient, which requires an initial evaluation prior to surgery, an individualized anesthetic plan and close postoperative control. Postoperative analgesia is a necessity in the control of acute postoperative pain, which requires the formulation of therapeutic plan that be individualized, preventive, agreed and logically related to the present reality of the patient. Final considerations: the choice of a correct postoperative analgesia that would be adequate for the type of surgery and the patient's environment is key to the development of a good and effective postoperative functional recovery(AU)

Descripción de la Cronología del Dolor de las Contracciones Uterinas para Analgesia del Trabajo de Parto, una tarea pendiente / Description of the chronology of the pain of uterine contractions for analgesia of labor, a pending task

Propósito: Describir la periodicidad del momento de máxima intensidad del dolor de las contracciones uterinas (CUs) durante el trabajo de parto (TDP) para eventualmente permitir el desarrollo de nuevos modelos de administración de analgesia endovenosa. Material y método: Embarazadas de término en TDP, reclutadas desde marzo 2014 por 18 meses, de manera no probabilística consecutiva. Se obtuvo el momento de máximo dolor por autoreporte de las pacientes con cronómetros, previa capacitación. Análisis: Regresión para medidas repetidas de efectos mixtos a los 3-5, 6-7 y 8-10cm de dilatación. La variable respuesta es el intervalo de tiempo desde el momento de máximo dolor de la CU basal al de la contracción siguiente. Resultados: En 64 pacientes, se obtuvo 5 intervalos de tiempo. Para la dilatación de 3-5cm una mediana=140.92 segundos y los coeficientes de regresión (CR) en 4 intervalos de tiempo con respecto al basal de 4.2, 15.9, -2.7 y -5.8 segundos. Para 67cm una mediana=131.16 seg y CR 13.4, 11.3, 2 y -10 seg. Para 8-10cm una mediana=129.3 seg y CR -6.7, 0.49, -2.5 y -7.7 seg. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los coeficientes de regresión. Conclusiones: Con los datos obtenidos podemos señalar que no hubo diferencias estadísticas significativas entre los intervalos de tiempo de los momentos de máximo dolor durante el TDP en fase activa. Esta información es relevante para apoyar el desarrollo de un modelo predictivo del dolor.

Aim: To describe the timing of the moment of maximum intensity of uterine contraction (UC) pain in labor to possibly enable the development of new models for administering endovenous analgesia. Materials and Methods: Full-term pregnant women in labor, recruited from March 2014 for 18 months, using consecutive nonprobability sampling. The moment of maximum pain was ascertained as self-reported by patients previously trained with chronometers. Analysis: Regression for repeated measurements from mixed results at 3-5, 6-7 and 8-10cm of dilation. The response variable was the time interval from the moment of maximum pain of the baseline UC to the following contraction. Results: In 64 patients, 5 time intervals were obtained. For the dilation of 3-5cm, a median=140.92 seconds and regression coefficients (RC) in 4 time intervals relative to the baseline of 4.2, 15.9, -2.7 and -5.8 seconds. For 6-7cm, a median =131.16 sec and RC 13.4, 11.3, 2 and -10 sec. For 8-10cm, a median =129.3 sec and RC -6.7, 0.49, -2.5 and -7.7 sec. There were no significant differences among the regression coefficients. Conclusions: With the data collected we can report that there were no statistically significant differences between the time intervals of the moments of maximum pain during active labor. This information is relevant to support the development of a predictive model for this pain.

Post-thoracotomy pain relief with subpleural analgesia or thoracic epidural analgesia: randomized clinical trial / Alívio da dor pós-toracotomia com analgesia subpleural ou analgesia epidural torácica: ensaio clínico randomizado

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Post-thoracotomy pain is a severe and intense pain caused by trauma to ribs, muscles and peripheral nerves. The current study aimed to compare subpleural analgesia (SPA) with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in patients undergoing thoracotomy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized study at Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, in Turkey. METHODS: Thirty patients presenting American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III were scheduled for elective diagnostic thoracotomy. The patients were randomized to receive either patient-controlled SPA or patient-controlled TEA for post-thoracotomy pain control over a 24-hour period. The two groups received a mixture of 3 µg/ml fentanyl along with 0.05% bupivacaine solution through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Rescue analgesia was administered intravenously, consisting of 100 mg tramadol in both groups. A visual analogue scale was used to assess pain at rest and during coughing over the course of 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: In the SPA group, all the patients required rescue analgesia, and five patients (33%) required rescue analgesia in the TEA group (P < 0.05). Patients who received subpleural analgesia exhibited higher visual analogue scores at rest and on coughing than patients who received thoracic epidural analgesia. None of the patients had any side-effects postoperatively, such as hypotension or respiratory depression. CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural analgesia is superior to subpleural analgesia for relieving post-thoracotomy pain. We suggest that studies on effective drug dosages for providing subpleural analgesia are necessary.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Dor pós-toracotomia é severa e intensa, causada por trauma de nervos periféricos, músculos e costelas. O objetivo foi comparar analgesia subpleural (SPA) com analgesia epidural torácica (TEA) em pacientes submetidos à toracotomia. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo randomizado no Hospital Educação e Pesquisa de Numune, em Ancara, Turquia. MÉTODOS: Trinta pacientes com o estado físico I-III da Sociedade Americana de Anestesiologistas foram agendados para toracotomia diagnóstica eletiva e escolhidos aleatoriamente para receber, num período de 24 horas, SPA ou TEA, ambas controladas pelo próprio paciente, para controle da dor pós-toracotomia. Os dois grupos receberam mistura de 3 ug/ml de fentanil com solução de 0,05% de bupivacaína por meio de bomba de analgesia controlada pelo paciente. Foi administrada analgesia de resgate por via intravenosa, com 100 mg de tramadol, nos dois grupos. No pós-operatório, a escala visual analógica foi utilizada para medir presença de dor durante a tosse ou em repouso, ao longo de 24 horas. RESULTADOS: No grupo SPA, todos os pacientes necessitaram de analgesia de resgate. Cinco pacientes (33%) necessitaram de analgesia de resgate no grupo TEA (P < 0,05). Os pacientes com SPA exibiram pontuações superiores na escala visual analógica, em repouso e ao tossir, em comparação aos que receberam TEA. Nenhum dos pacientes teve quaisquer efeitos secundários no pós-operatório, como hipotensão ou depressão respiratória. CONCLUSÃO: A analgesia peridural torácica é superior à analgesia subpleural no alívio da dor pós-toracotomia. Consideramos que estudos sobre a dosagem de drogas eficazes para proporcionar analgesia subpleural são necessários.

Prophylactic use of pregabalin for prevention of succinylcholine-induced fasciculation and myalgia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study / Uso profilático de pregabalina para prevenção de mialgia e fasciculação induzidas por succinilcolina: estudo randômico, duplo-cego e controlado por placebo

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Succinylcholine is commonly used to achieve profound neuromuscular blockade of rapid onset and short duration. OBJECTIVE: The present study compared the efficacy of pregabalin for prevention of succinylcholine-induced fasciculation and myalgia. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double blinded study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients of both genders undergoing elective spine surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients in Group P (pregabalin group) received 150 mg of pregabalin orally 1 h prior to induction of anesthesia with sips of water and patients in Group C (control group) received placebo. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg followed by succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg. The intensity of fasciculations was assessed by an observer blinded to the group allotment of the patient on a 4-point scale. A blinded observer recorded postoperative myalgia grade after 24 h of surgery. Patients were provided patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for postoperative pain relief. RESULTS: Demographic data of both groups were comparable (p > 0.05). The incidence of muscle fasciculation's was not significant between two groups (p = 0.707), while more patients in group C had moderate to severe fasciculation's compared to group P (p = 0.028). The incidence and severity of myalgia were significantly lower in group P (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pregabalin 150 mg prevents succinylcholine-induced fasciculations and myalgia and also decreases the fentanyl consumption in elective sine surgery.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA: A succinilcolina é comumente usada para atingir um bloqueio neuromuscular profundo, de início rápido e de curta duração. OBJETIVO: Comparar a eficácia de pregabalina na prevenção de mialgia e fasciculação induzidas por succinilcolina. DESENHO: Estudo prospectivo, randômico, duplo-cego e controlado por placebo. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Pacientes de ambos os sexos submetidos a cirurgia eletiva de coluna foram aleatoriamente divididos em dois grupos. Os pacientes do Grupo P (pregabalina) receberam 150 mg de pregabalina oral uma hora antes da indução da anestesia e os pacientes do Grupo C (controle) receberam placebo. A anestesia foi induzida com fentanil (1,5 mcg/kg) e propofol (1,5-2,0 mg/kg), seguidos de succinilcolina 1,5 mg/kg. A intensidade da fasciculação foi avaliada por um observador, cego para a alocação dos grupos, com uma escala de 4 pontos. Um observador cego registrou o grau pós-operatório de mialgia após 24 horas de cirurgia. Para o alívio da dor no pós-operatório, fentanil foi usado em sistema de analgesia controlada pelo paciente. RESULTADOS: Os dados demográficos de ambos os grupos eram comparáveis (p > 0,05). A incidência de fasciculação muscular não foi significativa entre os dois grupos (p = 0,707), enquanto mais pacientes do Grupo C apresentaram fasciculação de moderada a grave em relação ao Grupo P (p = 0,028). A incidência e a gravidade da mialgia foram significativamente menores no grupo P (p < 0,05). CONCLUSÃO: Pregabalina (150 mg) previne mialgia e fasciculação induzidas por succinilcolina, além de diminur o consumo de fentanil em cirurgia eletiva de coluna.

Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of naproxen sodium and naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate for arthroscopic meniscus surgery / Comparação dos efeitos analgésicos pós-operatórios de naproxeno sódico e naproxeno sódico-fosfato de codeína em artroscopia de menisco

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used to control arthroscopic pain. Addition of oral effective opioid "codeine" to NSAIDs may be more effective and decrease parenteral opioid consumption in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of naproxen sodium and a new preparation naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate when administered preemptively for arthroscopic meniscectomy. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were randomized into two groups to receive either oral naproxen sodium (Group N) or naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate (Group NC) before surgery. The surgery was carried out under general anesthesia. Intravenous meperidine was initiated by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for all patients. The primary outcome measure was pain score at the first postoperative hour assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Sedation assessed by Ramsey Sedation Scale, first demand time of PCA, postoperative meperidine consumption, side effects and hemodynamic data were also recorded. RESULTS: The groups were demographically comparable. Median VAS scores both at rest and on movement were significantly lower in Group NC compared with Group N, except 18th hour on movement (p < 0.05). The median time to the first demand of PCA was shorter in Group N compared with Group NC (p < 0.001). Meperidine consumption was higher in Group N compared with Group NC (p < 0.001). There was no difference between groups with respect to side effects (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate provided more effective analgesia than naproxen sodium and did not increase side effects.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Os anti-inflamatórios não esteroides (AINEs) são frequentemente usados para controlar a dor após artroscopia. A adição de um opiáceo oral eficaz (codeína) aos AINEs pode ser mais efetiva e diminuir o consumo de opiáceo parenteral no pós-operatório. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficácia e os efeitos colaterais de naproxeno sódico e uma nova preparação, naproxeno sódico-fosfato de codeína, quando administrados preventivamente para meniscectomia artroscópica. MÉTODOS: Foram randomicamente divididos em dois grupos 61 pacientes para receber naproxeno sódico por via oral (Grupo N) ou naproxeno sódico-fosfato de codeína (Grupo NC) antes da cirurgia. A cirurgia foi feita sob anestesia geral. Meperidina intravenosa foi iniciada por meio de analgesia controlada pelo paciente (ACP) para todos os pacientes. O desfecho primário foi o escore de dor na primeira hora de pós-operatório, avaliada com a escala visual snalógica (EVA). A sedação foi avaliada com a escala de sedação de Ramsey. A primeira demanda de ACP, o consumo de meperidina no pós-operatório, os efeitos colaterais e os dados hemodinâmicos também foram registrados. RESULTADOS: Os grupos foram demograficamente comparáveis. As medianas dos escores EVA tanto em repouso quanto em movimento foram significativamente menores no Grupo NC comparado com o Grupo N; exceto para movimento na avaliação de 18 horas (p < 0,05). A mediana do tempo até a primeira demanda de ACP foi menor no Grupo N em comparação com o Grupo NC (p < 0,001). O consumo de meperidina foi maior no Grupo N em comparação com o Grupo NC (p < 0,001). Não houve diferença entre os grupos em relação aos efeitos colaterais (p > 0,05). CONCLUSÕES: A combinação de naproxeno sódico-fosfato de codeína forneceu analgesia mais efetiva que naproxeno sódico, sem aumentar os efeitos colaterais.

Effect of nitrous oxide on fentanyl consumption in burned patients undergoing dressing change / Efeito do óxido nitroso sobre o consumo de fentanil em pacientes queimados submetidos à troca de curativo

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Thermal injuries and injured areas management are important causes of pain in burned patients, requiring that these patients are constantly undergoing general anesthesia for dressing change. Nitrous oxide (N2O) has analgesic and sedative properties; it is easy to use and widely available. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of N2O combined with fentanyl in burned patients during dressing change. METHOD: After approval by the institutional Ethics Committee, 15 adult burned patients requiring daily dressing change were evaluated. Patient analgesia was controlled with fentanyl 0.0005% administered by intravenous pump infusion on-demand. Randomly, in one of the days a mixture of 65% N2O in oxygen (O2) was associated via mask, with a flow of 10 L/min (N2O group) and on the other day only O2 under the same flow (control group). RESULTS: No significant pain reduction was seen in N2O group compared to control group. VAS score before dressing change was 4.07 and 3.4, respectively, in N2O and control groups. Regarding pain at the end of the dressing, patients in N2O group reported pain severity of 2.8; while the control group reported 2.87. There was no significant difference in fentanyl consumption in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The association of N2O was not effective in reducing opioid consumption during dressing changes.

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Os ferimentos térmicos e a manipulação das áreas lesadas são causas importantes de dor em pacientes vítimas de queimaduras, necessitando que estes pacientes sejam constantemente submetidos a anestesias gerais para a troca do curativo. O óxido nitroso (N2O) tem propriedades analgésicas e sedativas, sendo capaz de fácil utilização e de ampla disponibilidade. Com isto, objetivou-se avaliar o efeito analgésico da administração de N2O associado ao fentanil em pacientes queimados, durante a troca de curativo. MÉTODO: Após aprovação pela comissão de ética institucional, foram avaliados 15 pacientes adultos, vítimas de queimaduras com necessidade de troca diária de curativo. A analgesia do paciente foi controlada pelo uso de fentanil 0,0005% administrado por bomba de infusão sob demanda, intravenosa. De maneira aleatória, em um dos dias foi associada mistura de N2O a 65% em oxigênio (O2) sob máscara com fluxo de 10 L/min (grupo N2O) e no outro dia apenas O2 sob o mesmo fluxo (grupo controle). RESULTADOS: Não se observou diminuição significativa da dor no grupo N2O em relação ao grupo controle. A dor na EAV antes da troca do curativo foi de 4,07 e 3,4; respectivamente nos grupos N2O e controle. Quanto à dor ao término da troca de curativo, os pacientes do grupo N2O referiram dor intensidade 2,8; enquanto no grupo controle foi de 2,87. Não houve diferença significativa de consumo de fentanil em ambos os grupos. CONCLUSÕES: A associação de N2O não foi eficaz na redução no consumo de opióides durante a troca de curativos.

Efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine Combined with Intravenous Analgesia versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia after Gastrectomy

PURPOSE: Epidural analgesia has been the preferred analgesic technique after major abdominal surgery. On the other hand, the combined use of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IVPCA) has been shown to be a viable alternative approach for analgesia. We hypothesized that ITM combined with IVPCA is as effective as patient controlled thoracic epidural analgesia (PCTEA) with respect to postoperative pain control after conventional open gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients undergoing conventional open gastrectomy due to gastric cancer were randomly allocated into the intrathecal morphine combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IT) group or patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia (EP) group. The IT group received preoperative 0.3 mg of ITM, followed by postoperative IVPCA. The EP group preoperatively underwent epidural catheterization, followed by postoperative PCTEA. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were assessed until 48 hrs after surgery. Adverse effects related to analgesia, profiles associated with recovery from surgery, and postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery were also evaluated. RESULTS: This study failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of ITM-IVPCA (n=29) to PCTEA (n=30) with respect to VAS 24 hrs after surgery. Furthermore, the IT group consumed more fentanyl than the EP group did (1247.2+/-263.7 microg vs. 1048.9+/-71.7 microg, p<0.001). The IT group took a longer time to ambulate than the EP group (p=0.021) and had higher incidences of postoperative ileus (p=0.012) and pulmonary complications (p=0.05) compared with the EP group. CONCLUSION: ITM-IVPCA is not as effective as PCTEA in patients undergoing gastrectomy, with respect to pain control, ambulation, postoperative ileus and pulmonary complications.

Beneficial Effects of Adding Ketamine to Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Fentanyl after the Nuss Procedure in Pediatric Patients

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective, double-blind, randomized study was to investigate the analgesic effects of low-dose ketamine on intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with fentanyl for pain control in pediatric patients following the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl (Group F, n=30) or fentanyl plus ketamine (Group FK, n=30). Ten minutes before the end of surgery, following the loading dose of each solution, 0.5 microg/kg/hr of fentanyl or 0.5 microg/kg/hr of fentanyl plus 0.15 mg/kg/hr of ketamine was infused via an IV-PCA pump (basal rate, 1 mL/hr; bolus, 0.5 mL; lock out interval, 30 min). Fentanyl consumption, pain score, ketorolac use, nausea/vomiting, ondansetron use, pruritus, respiratory depression, hallucination, dreaming, and parent satisfaction with pain control were measured throughout the 48 hours following surgery. RESULTS: The pain scores, ketorolac use, and fentanyl consumption of Group FK were significantly lower than in Group F (p<0.05). The incidence of nausea/vomiting and ondansetron use in Group FK was significantly lower than in Group F (p<0.05). There were no reports of respiratory depression, hallucination or dreaming. Parent satisfaction with pain control was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We concluded that low-dose ketamine added to IV-PCA with fentanyl after the Nuss procedure in pediatric patients can reduce pain scores, consumption of fentanyl, and incidence of nausea/vomiting without increasing side effects.

Avaliação da analgesia controlada pelo paciente no pós-operató-rio de cirurgia cardíaca, com infusão continua de morfina / Evaluation of patient-controlled analgesia in the postoperative period of heart surgery with morphine continuous infusion

Justificativa e objetivos: A bomba de analgesia controlada pelo paciente (ACP) permite que sejam administrados opioides de forma segura e em diferentes programações. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a analgesia, efeitos colaterais e o consumo analgésico de pacientes em pós operatório de cirurgia cardíaca que utilizaram ACP na programação contínua mais bolus com morfina, por via venosa. Método: Estudo prospectivo unicêntrico. O acompanhamento foi realizado a partir da extubação dos pacientes a cada 6h,até 30h. Foram analisadas as seguintes variáveis: intensidade de dor, o consumo de analgésico, número de solicitações de analgésicos e ocorrência de efeitos colaterais.Resultados: A ausência da dor foi verificada em 86 por cento dospacientes, os efeitos colaterais predominantes foram náuseas e vômitos, houve diminuição significante no consumo e nasolicitação de morfina. Conclusão: A programação contínua mais bolus foi segura e eficaz no controle da dor.

Background and objectives: Patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA) allows for the safe administration of opioids in different schedules. This study aimed at evaluating analgesia, side-effects and analgesic consumption of patients in the postoperative period of heart surgery using intravenous PCA incontinuous infusion plus morphine bolus. Method: Prospective study carried out in a hospital of São Paulo. Patients were followed-up as from extubation every 6 h,until 30h. The following variables were evaluated: pain intensity, analgesic consumption, lumber of analgesic requests and side effects. Results: There has been no pain in 86 per cent of patients. Predominant side-effects were nausea and vomiting with significant decrease in morphine consumption and request. Conclusion: Continuous infusion plus bolus is safe and effective to control pain.

Analgesia pós-operatória: comparação entre infusão contínua de anestésico local e opioide via cateter peridural e infusão contínua de anestésico local via cateter na ferida operatória / Postoperative analgesia: comparing continuous epidural catheter infusion of local anesthetic and opioid and continuous wound catheter infusion of local anesthetic / Analgesia postoperatoria: comparación entre la infusión continua de anestésico local y opioide vía catéter epidural e infusión continua de anestésico local vía catéter en la herida operatoria

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A infusão contínua de anestésicos locais na ferida cirúrgica vem sendo investigada como um método no controle da dor pós-operatória, tendo sido demonstrada sua eficácia em relação à infusão de solução fisiológica. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a qualidade da analgesia pós-operatória, o uso de opioides como analgesia de resgate, a satisfação dos pacientes e a incidência de complicações entre a utilização de anestésico local e opioide via cateter peridural, com a infusão contínua de anestésico local na ferida operatória. MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados 38 pacientes submetidos a laparotomias eletivas sob anestesia geral, que foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos. O Grupo I recebeu como analgesia pós-operatória ropivacaína e fentanil em infusão contínua e controlada pelo paciente por cateter peridural (PCEA), enquanto o Grupo II, recebeu infusão contínua, controlada pelo paciente, de ropivacaina através de cateter implantado na ferida operatória. Foram avaliados no pós-operatório: a qualidade da analgesia por meio da Escala Analógica Visual de dor; o uso de opioides de resgate; os efeitos adversos à satisfação dos pacientes. RESULTADOS: Observaram-se diminuição da dor em repouso e em movimento (p < 0,05) e menor consumo de opioides de resgate (p < 0,05) no GI em todos os intervalos avaliados, bem como maior grau de satisfação na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica (SRPA). A incidência de complicações foi similar entre os grupos, exceto prurido que prevaleceu no GI entre 6 horas (p < 0,05) e 24 horas (p < 0,001) pós-operatórias. CONCLUSÕES: A analgesia pós-operatória com opioide e anestésico local via PCEA mostrou-se superior ao uso de anestésico local em infusão contínua e controlada pelo paciente na ferida operatória. A incidência de efeitos colaterais foi similar entre os grupos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Continuous wound infusion has been investigated as a method of postoperative pain control and its efficacy has been demonstrated when compared to saline infusion. The objective of this study was to compare the quality of postoperative analgesia, the use of opioids as rescue analgesia, patient satisfaction, and the incidence of complications between epidural catheter infusion of local anesthetic and opioids and continuous wound infusion of local anesthetic. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing elective laparotomy under general anesthesia, randomly divided into two groups, participated in this study. Group I (GI) received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with continuous infusion of ropivacaine and fentanyl, while Group II (GII) receive postoperative patient-controlled continuous wound catheter infusion of ropivacaine. In the postoperative period, the following parameters were assessed: quality of analgesia through the Visual Analogue Scale; use of rescue opioids; and adverse effects driving patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Decreased pain at rest and with movements (p < 0.05) and lower consumption of rescue opioids (p < 0.05) were observed in GI in all intervals evaluated, as well as greater patient satisfaction in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). The incidence of complications was similar in both groups except for pruritus which prevailed in GI between 6 (p < 0.05) and 24 (p < 0.001) postoperative hours. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative analgesia with opioids and local anesthetics via PCEA was superior to the patient-controlled local anesthetic infusion into surgical wound. The incidence of side effects was similar in both groups.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: La infusión continua de anestésicos locales en la herida quirúrgica, ha venido siendo investigada como un método en el control del dolor postoperatorio, habiendo sido demostrada su eficacia con relación a la infusión de solución fisiológica. El objetivo de este estudio, fue comparar la cualidad de la analgesia postoperatoria, el uso de opioides como analgesia de rescate, la satisfacción de los pacientes y la incidencia de complicaciones entre la utilización del anestésico local y el opioide vía catéter epidural, con la infusión continua de anestésico local en la herida operatoria. MÉTODOS: Se seleccionaron 38 pacientes sometidos a laparotomías electivas bajo anestesia general, que fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en dos grupos. El Grupo I recibió como analgesia postoperatoria, ropivacaína y fentanil en infusión continua y controlada por el paciente por catéter epidural (PCEA), mientras que el Grupo II, fue con infusión continua y controlada por el paciente de ropivacaina, a través de catéter implantado en la herida operatoria. En el postoperatorio se evaluaron: la calidad de la analgesia por medio de la Escala Analógica Visual de Dolor; el uso de opioides de rescate y los efectos adversos de la satisfacción de los pacientes. RESULTADOS: Observamos la disminución del dolor en reposo y en movimiento (p < 0,05), y un menor consumo de opioides de rescate (p < 0,05), en el GI en todos los intervalos evaluados, como también un mayor grado de satisfacción en la sala de recuperación postanestésica (SRPA). La incidencia de complicaciones fue similar entre los grupos con excepción del prurito, que prevaleció en el GI entre 6 horas (p < 0,05) y 24 horas (p < 0,001) postoperatorias. CONCLUSIONES: La analgesia postoperatoria con opioide y el anestésico local vía PCEA, fue superior al uso de anestésico local en infusión continua y controlada por el paciente en la herida operatoria. La incidencia de efectos colaterales fue similar entre los grupos.

Effect of Combined Single-Injection Femoral Nerve Block and Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement

PURPOSE: Total knee replacement is one of the most painful orthopedic procedures, and effective pain relief is essential for early mobility and discharge from hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether addition of single-injection femoral nerve block to epidural analgesia would provide better postoperative pain control, compared to epidural analgesia alone, after total knee replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients received a single-injection femoral nerve block with 0.25% levobupivacaine (30 mL) combined with epidural analgesia (femoral nerve block group) and 40 patients received epidural analgesia alone (control group). Pain intensity and volume of patient-controlled epidural analgesia medication and rescue analgesic requirements were measured in the first 48 hours after surgery at three time periods; 0-6 hours, 6-24 hours, and 24-48 hours. Also, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were evaluated. RESULTS: Median visual analog scale at rest and movement was significantly lower until 48 hours in the femoral nerve block group. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia volume was significantly lower throughout the study period, however, rescue analgesia requirements were significantly lower only up to 6 hours in the femoral nerve block group. The incidences of nausea and vomiting and rescue antiemetic requirement were significantly lower in the femoral nerve block group up to 6 hours. CONCLUSION: The combination of femoral nerve block with epidural analgesia is an effective pain management regimen in patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.

Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery / Estudo comparativo de duas diferentes modalidades de analgesia controlada pelo paciente após cirurgia cardíaca

INTRODUCTION: Acute and severe pain is frequent in patients who undergo cardiothoracic surgery. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) can be used to manage postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesia of morphine PCA alone (without continous infusion) with morphine PCA plus a continuous infusion on postoperative period after cardiac surgery and to evaluate pain scores, morphine consumption, number of demand, patient satisfaction and side effects. METHODS: Randomized trial was conducted to assess patients who underwent cardiac surgery receiving either morphine PCA alone or morphine PCA plus continous infusion. In the post operative period, PCA was started at extubation in both regiments according to randomization. Pain intensity, morphine consumption, number of demand, satisfaction and side effects were assessed at zero, six, twelve, eighteen, twenty four and thirty hours after patients' extubation. RESULTS: The study enrolled 100 patients. 50 patients received morphine PCA alone, (Group A) and 50 patients received morphine PCA plus a background infusion, (Group B). Group B patients had less demand, consumed more morphine and were more satisfied regarding analgesia. No statistical differences were shown between groups related to pain intensity, and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pain control was effective and similar in both groups. Morphine PCA alone seems to be better for postoperative pain manage in cardiac surgery, due to its less morphine expense with the same effectiveness.

INTRODUÇÃO: A dor aguda e intensa faz parte do cotidiano dos pacientes que realizam cirurgia cardíaca, e para o controle da dor, pode-se dispor da analgesia controlada pelo paciente (PCA -Patient controlled analgesia). OBJETIVO: Comparar a analgesia utilizando PCA sem infusão contínua com PCA mais infusão contínua de morfina no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca e avaliar a intensidade dolorosa, consumo analgésico, número de solicitações analgésicas, satisfação e efeitos colaterais. MÉTODOS: Ensaio clínico randomizado em que foram estudados pacientes submetidos a cirurgias cardíacas, que utilizaram PCA com e sem infusão intravenosa de morfina. No pós-operatório, ao se extubar os pacientes, foi instalada PCA nas duas modalidades, conforme o sorteio. Intensidade dolorosa, consumo analgésico, número de solicitações analgésicas, satisfação e efeitos colaterais foram avaliados no momento da extubação e nas 6, 12, 18, 24 e 30 horas seguintes. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 100 pacientes, sendo 50 no grupo (A) que recebeu PCA sem infusão contínua de morfina, e 50 no grupo (B) que utilizou PCA com infusão contínua de morfina. Pacientes do grupo (B) consumiram mais morfina, solicitaram menos vezes, e ficaram mais satisfeitos com a analgesia. Não se observaram diferenças significantes entre os grupos quanto à intensidade da dor e aos efeitos colaterais. CONCLUSÕES: O controle da dor foi eficiente e similar em ambos os grupos estudados. A mesma eficácia de analgesia e o menor consumo de morfina sugerem que PCA sem infusão contínua de morfina seja a melhor opção no controle da dor no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca.

Tratamiento del dolor agudo posoperatorio / Treatment of postoperative acute pain

Se revisó una amplia bibliografía actualizada con el objetivo de exponer la importancia del tratamiento del dolor posoperatorio, así como aspectos fundamentales en el uso de la analgesia controlada por el paciente, sus ventajas y desventajas. Se utilizaron textos recientes y otros de interés de autores especializados en este tema, así como la experiencia personal de los autores en la aplicación de métodos tan novedosos como la analgesia controlada por el paciente en cirugía. La efectividad analgésica resulta comparable con los métodos comúnmente utilizados (solo un 30 por ciento requiere medicación de rescate analgésico, por un 60 por ciento en los otros pacientes tratados). Las reacciones secundarias más comunes son las náuseas y vómitos, las cuales pueden ser evitadas en su mayor parte por el tratamiento preventivo con Ondasetrón 4 u 8 mg por vía endovenosa. La analgesia controlada por el paciente es un método eficaz de analgesia en las primeras horas del posoperatorio, pero los equipos y accesorios desechables para su uso resultan muy costosos, lo cual dificulta en países como Cuba ser aplicados de forma generalizada. Pese a ello, el desarrollo de cirugías muy dolorosas exigen una conducta más enérgica de anestesiólogos y cirujanos ante una problemática que continúa siendo una asignatura pendiente, el dolor posoperatorio.

Extensive updated literature was reviewed to set forth the importance of treating postoperative pain and the fundamental aspects of controlled analgesic therapy for the patient, its advantages and disadvantages. Recent publications and other papers of interest from authors who are specialists in this field were used, together with the personal experience of the authors of this paper regarding the application of novel methods such as patient-controlled analgesia at surgery. The analgesic effectiveness is comparable to those of the most common methods (only 30 percent requires analgesic rescue medication compared to 60 percent of the other treated patients). The most frequent side effects were nausea and vomit, which can be mostly prevented by a preventive treatment with Ondasetrón at a dose of 4-8 mg intravenously. Patient-controlled analgesia is an effective method during the first hours after surgery, but disposable pieces of equipment and accessories for this end are very expensive, which makes it difficult for countries like Cuba to apply this method on a broad scale. Despite this, the development of very painful types of surgeries demand more energetic behaviours on the part of anesthesiologists and surgeons to face a problem that is still pending and is called postoperative pain.

Comparison between epidural anesthesia [bupivacaine and fentanyl] mixture and continuous intravenous morphine for pain control in the treatment of major abdominal vascular surgery at Queen Alia Hospital

To compare the use of continuous epidural analgesia [Bupivaccine and Fentanyl] mixture and continuous intravenous Morphine in regard to efficacy and side effects for the relief of postoperative pain in the treatment of abdominal vascular surgery [upper and lower abdominal surgery]. This study was conducted at Queen Alia Hospital between January 2003 and December 2005. Age range of the study participants was between 45-80 years, 85 were males and 21 were females. The patients signed a consent form for surgical and anesthesia intervention. A total of 106 patients who had coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal failure or more than one of these diseases [American Society of Anesthesiologists III and IV class] were divided into two treatment modalities. Group A [60 patients] received continuous epidural analgesia [Bupivacain and Fentanyl] mixture while group B [46 patients] received continuous intravenous morphine for the relief of postoperative pain in the treatment of major abdominal vascular surgery. Pain was assessed postoperatively using pain relief score. The different side effects reported included nausea and vomiting, motor block, respiratory depression and sedation. Simple descriptive statistics and the Chi-Square test were used to analyze the data. P value of < 0.05 was considered statically significant. Pain relief was better among patients in group A than those in group B [P<0 .001]. Similarly, there was a lower statistically significant difference regarding side effects among patients in group A. Patients who received continuous epidural Bupivacaine and Fentanyl experienced better pain relief and fewer complications than those in the Morphine group. Results indicate that the use of epidural anesthesia [Fentanyl and Bupivacaine] is a safe procedure and is more efficient than the continuous intravenous morphine for pain relief in the treatment of major abdominal vascular surgery

Is Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia Enough for Pain Control in Patients Who Underwent Thoracoscopy?

This prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two common analgesic techniques, thoracic epidural patient-controlled analgesia (Epidural PCA), and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA), in patients undergoing lobectomy by the video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) approach. Fifty-two patients scheduled for VATS lobectomy were randomly allocated into two groups: an Epidural PCA group receiving an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%+fentanyl 5 microg/mL combination at a rate of 4 mL/hr, and an IV PCA group receiving an intravenous infusion of ketorolac 0.2 mg/kg+fentanyl 15 microg/mL combination at a rate of 1 mL/hr. Pain scores were then recorded using the visual analogue scale at rest and during motion (VAS-R and VAS-M, 0-10) for five days following surgery. In addition, we measured the daily morphine consumption, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), satisfaction score, and the incidence of side effects. Thirty-seven patients out of 52 completed the study (18 in the Epidural PCA group, 19 in the IV PCA group). There were no differences in the pain scores, analgesic requirements, pulmonary function, satisfaction score, and the incidence of side effects between groups. This indicates that IV PCA and Epidural PCA are equally effective to control the postoperative pain after VATS lobectomy, which suggests that IV PCA may be used instead of Epidural PCA.